Review of mineral resources and ore reserves
Review
Tables 1 and 2 summarise the mineral resources and
ore reserves attributed to Kumba Iron Ore’s current mining operations
and growth projects. The mineral resources are reported inclusive of
the ore reserves and are reflected as 100 percent owned irrespective
of the organisation’s attributable ownership, the details of which are
included in the respective tables.
Competent persons have estimated the mineral resources and ore reserves
reported. Kumba Iron Ore’s competent persons take responsibility for
estimating mineral resources and/or ore reserves on an operational basis.
They all have sufficient relevant experience in the style of mineralisation,
type of deposit and mining method as well as in the activity for which
they have taken responsibility as a ‘competent person’, as defined by the
SAMREC Code of 2000.
The mineral resource and ore reserve estimates have been signed off by
the relevant competent persons, who consent to the inclusion of the
information in this report in the form and context in which it appears.
A list of the competent persons responsible for Kumba Iron Ore’s
mineral resources and ore reserves is available from the company
secretary on written request.
Kumba Iron Ore’s operations are regularly audited on an ongoing internal
basis and on a three to four year rotational external basis to ensure that
internationally acceptable estimating processes are followed. All Kumba
Iron Ore operations and projects were externally audited in late 2005 as
part of the Kumba Resources Limited unbundling process.
The estimates reported here have been reviewed and are endorsed by
V Lickfold, the person within Kumba Iron Ore designated to take
corporate responsibility for mineral resources and ore reserves. Kumba
Iron Ore’s CEO, EJ Myburgh, also endorses the estimates presented in
the report.
|
 V Lickfold (Pr Sci Nat 400099/94) Manager, Geosciences
|
 EJ Myburgh CEO, Kumba Iron Ore
|
14 February 2007
Commentary
In South Africa, the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development
Act, No 28 of 2002 (MPRDA) was implemented on 1 May 2004, and
effectively transferred custodianship of the previously privately held
mineral rights to the State. Mining companies were given up to five
years to apply for prospecting permit conversions and five years to
apply for mining licence conversions for existing operations.
A prospecting right is a new order right that is valid for up to five
years initially, with the possibility of a further three year extension
obtainable either by the conversion of existing old order prospecting
permits or through new applications. A mining right is a new order
right valid for up to thirty years, obtained either by the conversion of
an old order mining licence, or as a new order right pursuant to the
exercising of the exclusive right of the holder of a new order
prospecting right, or as a new mining right application.
Kumba Iron Ore achieved the required 26 percent BEE participation in
accordance with the MPRDA when the unbundling was finalised in
November 2006. In preparing Kumba Iron Ore’s mineral resource and
ore reserve estimates, the following reporting principles have been
adopted in respect of prospecting and mining rights:
- Where applications for new order mining rights have been
submitted – either as conversions (Sishen Mine and Thabazimbi
Mine) or as a new application (Sishen South Mine) – and are still
being processed by the relevant regulatory authorities, the relevant
mineral resources and ore reserves have been reported; and
- Where new-order prospecting rights have been granted
(Zandrivierspoort), the relevant mineral resources have been
reported.
Sishen Iron Ore Company submitted a new mining application for the
Sishen South project in 2005. It must be noted that a new order
prospecting right application, submitted before the new order mining
right application, was refused by the Department of Minerals and
Energy (DME) for two farms within the Sishen South group of farms.
The DME, however, accepted the new mining right application for the
whole area, including the two farms for which the new order
prospecting right applications were refused. Attorneys acting for Sishen
Iron Ore Company have informed the DME in writing that Kumba Iron
Ore withheld an appeal against the refusal of the new order prospecting
rights for the two farms as a gesture of goodwill pending the granting
of the new order mining right for the Sishen South Project as a whole.
Despite in-fill drilling and subsequent geological model updates
resulting in a net decrease in the mineral resources reported for Sishen
Mine, an increase in the ore reserves was realised by the effective use
of a new optimising programme, which saw the blending of an
additional 139 Mt of previously (2005) unblendable material. This, in
effect, increases the utilisation of the available resources from
83 percent in 2005 to 92 percent in 2006. The latter resulted in an
overall increase in the proved ore reserves of 87 Mt, despite the
decrease associated with measured mineral resources and 31 Mt of
mining depletion. The decrease in the probable ore reserves can be
directly linked to the decrease in indicated mineral resources. Of the
50 Mt decrease in saleable product, 28,5 Mt is ascribed to the
reduction of ROM ore reserves as a result of geological model updates.
The remaining 21,5 Mt is due to a slight drop in plant yield, which in
turn is the result of the exclusion of selective mining tonnes previously
included in the ore reserve estimates. Note that 17 Mt of inferred mineral
resources fall within the final pit layout; these are not included in the ore
reserve figure reported. The additional underground mineral resources at
Sishen Mine increased by 140 Mt (30%) because the conglomeratic ore
was not reported in 2005.
Thabazimbi Mine’s mineral resources were mostly depleted as a result
of mining 3 Mt during 2006. This was partially offset by gains as a
result of updated geological models. Most of the decrease in the ore
reserves is the result of annual mining production (3 Mt), although
blending difficulties (0,4 Mt), updated geological models (0,1 Mt) and
reclassification of mineral resources into the inferred category (0,9 Mt)
accounted for the remaining decrease.
The increase in the mineral resources of Sishen South from 2005 to
2006 is the result of model updates brought about by the addition of
new exploration information as well as a revision of the geostatistical
parameters used for estimating. Note, however, that part of the increase
is due to the prescribed depth limits having been relaxed for mineral
resource estimates for the Leeuwfontein deposit based on new layouts.
New pit layout designs explain the marginal decrease in the ore reserves
reported for the Sishen South Project. The increase in proved ore
reserves is directly linked to the updated geological models and
increases in measured mineral resources, whereas the increase in
indicated mineral resources accompanied by decreased probable ore
reserves is the result of the depth limit change mentioned above.
The Sishen South Project feasibility study for a 9 Mtpa open-pit
operation will benefit from the updated geological models and
improved mineral resource and ore reserve estimates and should be
completed in the first quarter of 2007.
Following the granting of the new order prospecting rights for the
Zandrivierspoort Project, work will commence early in 2007 on baseline
environmental studies and additional tests to refine the modifying
factors related to beneficiation.
Once security of tenure has been satisfactorily resolved, the third
exploration season will commence in Senegal with the drilling of
a number of boreholes in the central Falémé region. The current
exploration focus at Falémé is to improve the resource classification
of, and better delineate, the magnetite-rich iron ore deposits.
Table 1: Mineral resources
| |
2006 |
2005 |
|
| Commodity |
Operation |
% attributable to Kumba Iron Ore |
Resource category |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Grade (% Fe) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Grade (% Fe) |
% change |
| Iron ore |
Sishen Mine1 |
|
Measured |
1 397,6 |
57,0 |
1 477,3 |
57,4 |
(5) |
| |
– DMS + jig plant |
58,2 |
Indicated |
421,7 |
56,2 |
479,7 |
56,5 |
(12) |
| |
|
|
Inferred |
23,8 |
57,1 |
28,6 |
55,9 |
(17) |
|
| |
|
|
Subtotal |
1 843,1 |
56,8 |
1 985,6 |
57,2 |
(7) |
|
| |
Sishen Mine1 |
|
Measured |
114,8 |
64,6 |
93,9 |
64,9 |
22 |
| |
– additional resources |
58,2 |
Indicated |
266,4 |
64,3 |
222,6 |
64,7 |
20 |
| |
(underground) |
|
Inferred |
227,7 |
64,1 |
152,8 |
64,5 |
49 |
|
| |
|
|
Subtotal |
608,9 |
64,3 |
469,3 |
64,7 |
30 |
| |
|
|
Total |
2 452,0 |
|
2 454,9 |
|
|
|
| Iron ore |
Thabazimbi Mine2* |
|
Measured |
8,5 |
62,1 |
10,9 |
62,1 |
(23) |
| |
– within current pit layouts |
74,0 |
Indicated |
2,9 |
61,4 |
3,9 |
61,6 |
(27) |
| |
|
|
Inferred |
4,2 |
61,8 |
3,0 |
61,7 |
38 |
|
| |
|
|
Subtotal |
15,6 |
61,9 |
17,8 |
61,9 |
13 |
|
| |
Thabazimbi Mine2* |
|
Measured |
12,4 |
62,2 |
12,4 |
62,1 |
- |
| |
– additional resources |
74,0 |
Indicated |
14,1 |
61,8 |
14,3 |
61,3 |
(1) |
| |
|
|
Inferred |
16,9 |
60,6 |
16,8 |
60,0 |
1 |
|
| |
|
|
Subtotal |
43,4 |
61,4 |
43,5 |
61,0 |
- |
| |
|
|
Total |
59,0 |
|
61,3 |
|
|
|
| |
Sishen South3 |
|
Measured |
156,3 |
65,4 |
140 |
65,4 |
11 |
| |
– advanced project |
74,0 |
Indicated |
149,6 |
64,8 |
108 |
64,4 |
39 |
| |
|
|
Inferred |
66,7 |
62,9 |
42 |
62,0 |
58 |
|
| |
|
|
Total |
372,6 |
64,7 |
290 |
64,5 |
28 |
|
| |
Zandrivierspoort |
|
Measured |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| |
– project |
37,0 |
Indicated |
447,0 |
34,9 |
447 |
34,9 |
- |
| |
|
|
Inferred |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
| |
|
|
Total |
447,0 |
34,9 |
447 |
34,9 |
- |
|
The tonnages are quoted in metric tonnes and million tonnes is abbreviated as Mt.
Rounding of figures may cause computational discrepancies.
Figures reported at 100 percent irrespective of percentage attributable to Kumba Iron Ore.
|
| |
Note that ALL operations and projects were audited in 2005 as part of Project Pangolin.
| 1 |
The decrease in Sishen Mine’s DMS and jig plant mineral resources is the result of model updates, mining depletion, and stockpile growth. The additional
underground mineral resources increased by 140 Mt (30 percent) because the conglomeratic ore was not reported in 2005. |
| 2 |
Mining depletion accounts for 79 percent (3,3 Mt) of the decrease in in-pit mineral resources at Thabazimbi Mine. The additional mineral resources decreased by
0,2 Mt due to solids model reinterpretation. |
| 3 |
The 28 percent increase in mineral resources for Sishen South is mainly the result of solids and block model updates, although a small proportion is because layout
depth limits have not been applied as they have been previously. See text for legal comment. |
| * |
Externally audited in 2005. |
|
Table 2: Ore reserves
| |
2006 |
2005 |
|
| Commodity |
Operation |
% attributable to
Kumba Iron Ore |
Reserve
category |
ROM
(Mt) |
Grade
(% Fe) |
Saleable
product
(Mt) |
ROM
(Mt) |
Grade
(% Fe) |
Saleable
product
(Mt) |
% change
from
2005 to
2006 |
| Iron ore |
Sishen Mine 4* |
58,2 |
Proved |
813,3 |
58,1 |
567 @ 65,8% Fe |
727,0 |
59,3 |
600 @ 65,7% Fe |
12 |
| |
– DMS + jig plant |
|
Probable |
240,5 |
57,2 |
226 @ 63,9% Fe |
294,2 |
58,1 |
243 @ 64,0% Fe |
(18) |
|
| |
|
|
Total |
1 053,8 |
57,9 |
793 @ 65,3% Fe |
1 021,2 |
59,0 |
843 @ 65,2% Fe |
3 |
|
| |
Thabazimbi Mine 5* |
74,0 |
Proved |
7,3 |
61,6 |
6 @ 64,5% Fe |
10,3 |
61,2 |
9 @ 64,1% Fe |
(29) |
| |
|
|
Probable |
2,4 |
60,9 |
2 @ 63,9% Fe |
3,8 |
60,2 |
3 @ 63,6% Fe |
(38) |
|
| |
|
|
Total |
9,6 |
61,4 |
8 @ 64,3% Fe |
14,1 |
60,9 |
13 @ 63,9% Fe |
(32) |
|
| Iron ore |
Sishen South6 |
74,0 |
Proved |
134,1 |
65,4 |
n/a |
100,5 |
64,8 |
n/a |
33 |
| |
|
|
Probable |
31,5 |
64,2 |
n/a |
66,4 |
63,3 |
n/a |
(53) |
|
| |
|
|
Total |
165,6 |
65,2 |
n/a |
166,9 |
64,2 |
n/a |
(1) |
|
Rounding of figures may cause computational discrepancies.
Figures reported at 100 percent irrespective of percentage attributable to Kumba Iron Ore. |
| |
Note that ALL operations and projects were audited in 2005 as part of Project Pangolin.
| 4 |
The increase in proved ore reserve tonnes is the result of a new optimising programme that allowed for the blending of previously stockpiled material. The decrease
in saleable product tonnes is mainly due to the reduction of ROM reserves as a result of geological re-interpretation as well as a slight drop in plant yield brought
about by the exclusion of selective mining tonnes due to changes in mine planning criteria. 17 Mt inferred mineral resource tonnes fall within the final pit layout;
these are not included in the ore reserve figure. |
| 5 |
Mining depletion (3 Mt), reclassification (1,2 Mt) and model updates (0,2 Mt) account for the decrease in the ore reserves at Thabazimbi Mine. 4,2 Mt of inferred
mineral resources within the final pit shells are not included in the ore reserve figures reported. |
| 6 |
The increase in proved ore reserves is directly linked to the re-interpretation and model updates for measured mineral resources, whereas the increase in indicated
mineral resources but decrease in probable ore reserves is because the depth limit has not yet been applied to the mineral resource figures. See text for legal comment. |
| * |
Externally audited in 2005. |
|
|