Corporate governance and risk management
Kumba Iron Ore is committed to the highest standards of business integrity, ethical values and professionalism in all its
activities. As an essential part of this commitment, the board supports the highest standards of corporate governance
and the directors are responsible to the Kumba Iron Ore shareholders. The key principles underpinning the corporate
governance of the group and systems of control that form an integral part of corporate governance, are set
out below:
Board of directors
In preparation for the company’s listing on the JSE in November 2006
a number of corporate governance processes, policies and procedures
were adopted by the board. These included, inter alia, a board charter,
terms of reference for the various board committees, a conflict of
interest policy, a procedure for directors to have access to professional
advice, a policy for trading in shares and a policy for disclosure of
information. Additional policies and procedures, including a code of
ethics, will be implemented as required during 2007.
The board charter is based on the acknowledgement that the board is
responsible to the Kumba Iron Ore shareholders for setting the strategic
direction of Kumba Iron Ore through the establishment of strategic
objectives and key policies. In terms of its charter, the board meets on
a regular basis, at least four times a year. The board considers issues of
strategic direction, major acquisitions and disposals and approves major
capital expenditure and other matters having a material effect on
Kumba Iron Ore. Where relevant, presentations are made to the board
by business management on the activities of operations. Opportunities
for the board to visit operations and projects are arranged. All the
directors participated in a visit to Sishen Mine early in 2007 which
included a guided tour of the mining operations as well as
presentations by the business management teams of both Sishen and
Thabazimbi Mines on their expansion plans. This opportunity was also
used by the board to discuss issues of strategic importance to the
group with the business’ management teams.
The composition of the board, with a strong independent element,
ensures that no one individual has unfettered powers of decision and
authority.
The chairman is responsible for leading the board and for its
effectiveness. The company secretary, with the support of the CEO, is
responsible for ensuring that the directors receive timely, accurate and
clear information before board meetings and updates of issues arising
between meetings. The executive committee is responsible for the
overall day-to-day management of the group.
The directors have a wide range of expertise as well as significant
experience in financial, commercial and mining activities. All directors
have full access to internal and external auditors, and are encouraged
to stay fully abreast of the group’s business through meetings with
senior management and site visits. Induction, training and briefings are
available to all directors on appointment and subsequently, as necessary,
taking into account existing qualifications and experience.
All directors have access to management, and to the advice and services
of the company secretary, and to such information as is needed to carry
out their duties and responsibilities fully and effectively. Furthermore, all
directors are entitled to seek independent professional advice concerning
the affairs of the group at its expense.
Six board meetings were held during 2006 in preparation for the listing
of the company on the JSE and one meeting took place following the
listing in November 2006. The November 2006 meeting was attended
by all the directors except for Dr Moyo, based in London, who tendered
his apologies due to other commitments.
All non-executive directors are subject to election by shareholders at
the first opportunity following their appointment. In addition, nonexecutive
directors retire by rotation and stand for re-election by
Kumba Iron Ore shareholders at least once every three years in
accordance with the company’s articles of association.
Executive management
Executive committee
The executive committee is a management forum chaired by the CEO
and includes the CFO, a number of senior managers, and the company
secretary. The executive committee meets on a monthly basis to assist
the CEO in formulating strategies, monitoring performance, defining
the group’s risk tolerance capacity and acting as a sounding board on
issues to be presented to the board and board committees.
Committees of the board
Subject to specific fundamental, strategic and formal matters reserved
for its decision, the board delegates certain responsibilities to a number of standing committees, which operate within defined terms of
reference laid down by the board. The terms of reference of the
committees deal inter alia with the composition, number of meetings
and responsibilities of each committee. All members of the committees
are appointed on recommendation of the human resources,
remuneration and nomination committee. Except for the audit and risk
committee, none of the committees met during 2006 and formal
committee meetings commenced in accordance with the agreed
meeting schedule for 2007. The board committees consist only of nonexecutive
directors.
These committees are:
- Human resources, remuneration and nomination;
- Safety and sustainable development; and
- Audit and risk.
Human resources, remuneration and nomination
committee
The human resources, remuneration and nomination committee,
comprising solely of non-executive directors, is responsible for:
- setting human resources and remuneration policies and practices
for the group in general; and
- making recommendations on the composition of the board and
board committees and ensuring that the board of directors consists
of individuals who are equipped to fulfil the role of director of the
company.
The members of the committee are:
Mr Peter Matlare – Chairman
Mr Allen Morgan
Mr Philip Baum
Mr Lazarus Zim.
The committee did not meet during 2006.
Safety and sustainable development committee (S&SD)
The S&SD committee is responsible for developing framework policies
and guidelines for the management of sustainable development issues,
including safety, health and environmental matters, and ensuring the
progressive implementation of these throughout the group. The S&SD
committee meets three times each year, including visits to operations,
and business unit heads will be invited to attend S&SD meetings. Each
business unit head will make an annual safety and sustainable
development presentation to the S&SD committee.
The members of the committee are:
Ms Dolly Mokgatle – Chairman
Mr Allen Morgan
Mr Peter Matlare.
The committee did not meet in 2006.
Audit and risk committee
The primary objectives of the audit and risk committee are to ensure the
integrity of financial reporting and the audit process, and that a sound
risk management and internal control system is maintained. In pursuing
these objectives, the committee oversees relations with the external
auditors and reviews the effectiveness of the internal audit function.
In fulfilling its responsibility of monitoring the integrity of financial
reports to shareholders, the committee reviews accounting principles,
policies and practices adopted in the preparation of public financial
information and examines documentation relating to the annual report,
interim report, preliminary announcements and related public reports.
The committee reviews regular internal and external audit reports on
the results of audits at various operations.
The internal audit function, which has been outsourced to ABAS
(Anglo Assurance Business Services) from 2007, reports directly to the
committee and is accountable for maintaining company auditing
standards, including risk reporting. The internal auditor’s mandate and
annual audit coverage plans are approved by the committee, and the
committee will consider reports on the results of internal audit work
and risk management information. The effectiveness of the internal
audit function will be evaluated by means of annual assessments
against predetermined criteria and periodic external peer reviews,
the results of which will be reported to the committee.
The members of the committee are:
Mr Gert Gouws – Chairman
Ms Dolly Mokgatle
Dr Nkosana Moyo.
The committee met twice following the listing of the company on the
JSE in November 2006 and all members of the committee were in
attendance at the meeting.
Policy on external auditors’ independence
Kumba Iron Ore’s policy on auditors’ independence is consistent with
the ethical standards promulgated by the Auditing Practices Board and
published in December 2004.
Internal control
The executive committee is responsible for establishing a system of
internal control to manage significant group risks. The board’s approach
to risk management encompasses all significant business risks to the group, including financial, operational and compliance risk, which could
undermine the achievement of business objectives. This system of risk
management is designed so that the different businesses are able to
tailor and adapt their risk management processes to suit their specific
circumstances. There is clear accountability for risk management, which
is a key performance area of line managers throughout the group. The
requisite risk and control capability is assured through board challenge
and appropriate management selection and skills development.
Managers are supported in giving effect to their risk responsibilities
through policies and guidelines on risk and control management.
Continuous monitoring of risk and control processes provides the basis
for regular and exception reporting to business management and the
boards of subsidiary companies, the executive committee and the board
of directors of the company. The risk assessment and reporting criteria
are designed to provide the board with a consistent perspective of the
key risks. The reports to the board, submitted via the audit and risk
committee, include an assessment of the likelihood and impact of risks
materialising, as well as risk mitigation initiatives and their effectiveness.
The system of internal control, which is embedded in all key
operations, provides reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance that
the group’s business objectives will be achieved within the risk
tolerance levels defined by the board. Kumba Iron Ore seeks to have
a sound system of internal control, based on the group’s policies,
in all material associates and joint ventures. In those companies that
are independently managed, the directors who are represented on
these organisations’ boards seek assurance that significant risks
are being managed.
The group’s internal audit function has a formal collaboration process
in place with the external auditors to ensure efficient coverage of
internal controls. The internal audit function will be responsible for
providing independent assurance to the executive committee and the
board on the effectiveness of the risk management process throughout
the group.
Whistleblowing programme
A whistleblowing policy has been implemented by the group. This
programme, which is monitored by the audit and risk committee, is
aimed at enabling employees, customers, suppliers, managers or other
stakeholders, on a confidential basis, to raise concerns in cases where
conduct is deemed to be contrary to ethical behaviour.
The programme makes available, via an independent service provider,
a selection of telephonic, e-mail, web-based and surface mail communication channels, to any person who has information about
unethical practices in the group and its managed operations. Quarterly
reports on reported matters and subsequent investigations are
submitted to the audit and risk committee for notification.
Relations with shareholders
Following the listing of the company, Kumba Iron Ore maintains an
active dialogue with its key financial audiences, including institutional
shareholders and sell-side analysts. Regular presentations will take
place at the time of interim and final results as well as during the
rest of the year.
Risk management
Risk philosophy
Kumba Iron Ore maintains an integrated, enterprise-wide, risk
management programme (IRM). The group applies a logical, systematic
and repetitive methodology to identify, analyse, assess, treat and
monitor all risks, whether they are insurable or not.
The effectiveness of the IRM process is measured by how well it aligns
the key fundamentals of governance, business objectives, ethics,
policies, standards, strategies and compliance. Kumba Iron Ore
recognises the complexity and diversity of risks that face all its
operational activities and integrates all efforts to maximise
opportunities and minimise exposures to risk and to reduce them,
where necessary, to levels commensurate with its risk appetite.
Risk culture
The group’s policy is zero tolerance for compliance failures and its aim
is to identify speedily and to rectify any deviation. Promoting a riskconscious
culture is a constant focus throughout the group and this
culture proactively supports achieving our strategic business objectives.
Each risk owner is responsible for monitoring the existing and everchanging
risk profile of the group on a continuous basis.
To this end, a monthly risk review that covers both internal and
external risks has been instituted with findings reported to the
executive committee.
Divisional and business unit risk committees play an important role in
identifying operational risk and in the development and application of
generic mitigating strategies. They also have a risk oversight function
by virtue of being closer to activities that could have adverse results.
Each committee is chaired by the head of the business centre and
meets monthly.
Risk management objectives
The risk management process is continuous, with well-defined steps,
which support better decision-making by contributing a greater insight
into risks and their impacts. Risks from all sources are identified and
once they pass the materiality threshold, a formal process begins in
which causal factors and consequences are identified and the
correlation with other risks and the current risk mitigating strategy is
reviewed. One of the challenges is to ensure that mitigating strategies
are geared to deliver reliable and timely risk information to support
better decision-making.
Reporting
Continuous monitoring of risk and control processes, across headline
risk areas and other business specific risk areas, provides the basis for
regular and exception reporting to business management and boards.
The headline risk areas are:
- Foreign exchange
- Commodity prices
- Treasury
- Counterparties
- Employees
- Employee safety
- Employee health
- Environmental
- Social
- Political
- Legal and regulatory, finance
- Reserves and resources
- Operational performance
- Capital projects
- Mergers and acquisitions
- Technology
- Infrastructure
- Event risk.
The risk assessment and reporting criteria are designed to provide the
executive committee and the board, via the audit and risk committee,
with a consistent, enterprise-wide perspective of the key risks. The
reports which are submitted monthly to the executive committee and
quarterly to the audit and risk committee include an assessment of the
likelihood and impact of risks materialising, as well as risk mitigation
initiatives and their effectiveness.
In conducting its annual review of the effectiveness of risk management,
the board will consider the key findings from the ongoing monitoring
and reporting processes, management assertions and independent assurance reports. The board will also take account of material changes
and trends in the risk profile and consider whether the control system,
including reporting, adequately supports the board in achieving its risk
management objectives.
Risk factors
Kumba Iron Ore’s business, financial position, results of operation,
growth, strategies and dividend policy could be materially adversely
affected by risks, including any of those set out below. These risks
could also have an adverse effect on the trading price of the Kumba
Iron Ore shares.
The risks described below are not the only risks faced by Kumba Iron
Ore. Currently unknown risk factors and risks directors deem
immaterial may also impair its business operations.
Mining exploration and projects
In order to expand its operations and mineral resources and reserve
base, Kumba Iron Ore relies on its exploration programme and its ability
to develop mining projects. Resource exploration and development are
speculative in nature, characterised by a number of significant risks.
Further exploration on, and development of, mines and projects will
require additional capital, which will need to be sourced as required.
The current buoyant construction market in South Africa may result in
an increase in the cost of capital required for major construction projects.
Mining operations
The mining operations of Kumba Iron Ore are subject to the risks
and hazards that are normally encountered in open-cast mining
operations. These risks include environmental hazards, such as
unexpected geological pressures and ground subsidence, and
operational risks relating to materials handling, industrial accidents,
blasting and removing material from an open-cast pit. If any of these risks
should materialise, such event could potentially result in serious harm to
employees and contractors, delays in production, increased production
costs and a possible increase in the liabilities of Kumba Iron Ore.
Mining operations, development and exploration activities are further
subject to extensive legislation and regulations. Changes in this regulatory
environment could increase the group’s cost of production and, as in
most other businesses, its failure to adhere thereto, could result in the
revocation of the consents, licences and rights that it requires to conduct
its business.
Cost factors such as a rise in the crude oil price, ageing mining and
plant equipment, compliance costs, short supply of diesel, electricity and haul truck tyres as well as rising stripping ratio in the long-term
due to geology changes at Sishen Mine may increase production costs.
Disruption to the supply of key inputs or changes in their pricing may
threaten Kumba Iron Ore’s ability to produce products at competitive
rates (increase in production cost) and on a timely basis (throughput
losses).
Growth prospects
Sishen Mine is under a contractual obligation to deliver up to
6,25 Mtpa of iron ore to Mittal at a price which recovers the cost of
production plus 3 percent. Mittal may, on certain conditions and with
proper notice, procure iron ore for use within South Africa in excess of
6,25 Mtpa from Kumba Iron Ore at a price and on terms and
conditions to be negotiated in good faith. Under certain circumstances,
Mittal may have the right to participate in and proportionately fund
future SIOC iron ore expansion projects or new projects in South Africa.
Kumba Iron Ore has previously indicated that there was a difference of
interpretation with regards to the terms of the agreement with Mittal.
Regrettably these differences could not be resolved amicably and the
parties have decided to resort to arbitration.
Kumba Iron Ore aims to more than double its output by 2015. The
associated challenge of this opportunity is to bring online new growth
projects, on time and within budget. Kumba Iron Ore seeks to develop
new mining properties and expand its existing operations as a means
of generating shareholder value. New mining properties are identified
through an active exploration programme whilst current operations are
expanded by technology applications to upgrade medium grade iron ore.
Labour
Kumba Iron Ore is, to a great extent, reliant on the large number
of persons employed in its operations. The availability of skills in the
mining industry, especially those of artisans, may have an impact on
current production and future growth in the industry.
Unionised operations are exposed to the risks posed by organised
labour disruption and disputes. The group’s production costs may also
be increased as a result of increases in wages and employee benefits.
The incidence of HIV/Aids in South Africa is high and may adversely
impact on the operations of Kumba Iron Ore through potentially
reduced productivity and increased medical and other costs.
Kumba Iron Ore operates in an industry that is subject to numerous
safety regulations. Failure to provide a safe working environment may
expose the organisation to compensation liabilities, loss of business
reputation and other costs.
Environmental risks
The group’s operations are subject to environmental legislation and
regulations. If any of the legislation or regulations should be changed,
Kumba Iron Ore’s production costs could be increased.
Activities harmful to the environment may expose the group to
additional costs.
Commodity price fluctuations
Iron ore prices typically lag the steel commodity cycle by approximately
18 months. Iron ore prices are negotiated annually with the major
international steel producers. Kumba Iron Ore has historically followed
these international price settlements in its annual price negotiations
with its clients.
Currency fluctuations
Iron ore prices are normally determined in US dollar terms. Strengthening
or weakening of the US dollar could, therefore, have a significant effect
on the financial position and financial results of the group.
Risks related to the mining industry in South Africa
South Africa has enacted legislation that promotes the ownership and
control of mining companies by HDSA’s as set out in the Mining Charter.
The HDSA’s legislation enacted in South Africa at present, requires all
mining companies to convert the rights that they held under the previous
legislation into rights under the new legislation. Kumba Iron Ore has
commenced application for conversion of its old order mineral rights
to new order mining rights. The Kumba Resources empowerment
transaction was structured to satisfy the 2014 equity ownership
requirements of the Mining Charter in respect of Kumba Iron Ore.
Rail and port
Kumba Iron Ore does not own or operate any of its logistical chain assets
and exports its iron ore to its international customers through a single
channel rail and port. Labour and other operational risks associated with
the management of the rail operators’ assets fall outside the scope of
the group’s direct control and may impact on its results.
|